U.S. MILITARY IN PERSPECTIVE
| Annual Military Spending |
||
|---|---|---|
| US$ Billion | ||
| 1 | United States | 713.1 |
| 2 | China | 70.4 |
| 3 | France | 62.6 |
| 4 | United Kingdom | 62.4 |
| 5 | Japan | 53.1 |
| 6 | Germany | 43.4 |
| 7 | Russia | 38.2 |
| 8 | Italy | 31.1 |
| 9 | Saudi Arabia | 31.1 |
| 10 | India | 30.2 |
| 11 | South Korea | 28.5 |
| 12 | Brazil | 24.0 |
| 13 | Australia | 23.0 |
| 14 | Canada | 19.0 |
| 15 | Spain | 19.0 |
| 16 | Turkey | 14.0 |
| 17 | Israel | 13.3 |
| 18 | Netherlands | 12.0 |
| 19 | Poland | 11.8 |
| 20 | Taiwan | 10.5 |
| 21 | Greece | 8.0 |
| 22 | Singapore | 7.9 |
| 23 | Colombia | 7.8 |
| 24 | Singapore | 7.8 |
| 25 | Sweden | 6.3 |
| 26 | Iran | 6.3 |
| 27 | Mexico | 6.1 |
| 28 | Norway | 5.7 |
| 29 | North Korea | 5.5 |
| 30 | Chile | 5.2 |
| 31 | Iraq | 5.0 |
| 32 | Thailand | 5.0 |
| 33 | Algeria | 5.0 |
| 34 | Peru | 4.9 |
| 35 | Indonesia | 4.7 |
| 36 | Morocco | 4.1 |
| 37 | South Africa | 4.1 |
| 38 | Belgium | 4.0 |
| 39 | Venezuela | 4.0 |
| 40 | Finland | 3.7 |
| 41 | Portugal | 3.5 |
| 42 | Egypt | 3.3 |
| 43 | Denmark | 3.3 |
| 44 | Vietnam | 3.2 |
| 45 | Kuwait | 3.0 |
| 46 | Austria | 3.0 |
| 47 | Romania | 2.9 |
| 48 | Czech Republic | 2.8 |
| 49 | Argentina | 2.6 |
| 50 | Switzerland | 2.5 |
| 51 | Azerbaijan | 2.5 |
| 52 | Ukraine | 2.1 |
| 53 | Angola | 2.0 |
| 54 | Ecuador | 1.7 |
| 55 | Malaysia | 1.7 |
| 56 | Sri Lanka | 1.6 |
| 57 | United Arab Emirates | 1.6 |
| 58 | New Zealand | 1.5 |
| 59 | Slovakia | 1.4 |
| 60 | Jordan | 1.4 |
| 61 | Hungary | 1.4 |
| 62 | Philippines | 1.3 |
| 63 | Buglaria | 1.3 |
| 64 | Libya | 1.3 |
| 65 | Ireland | 1.3 |
| 66 | Serbia | 1.2 |
| 67 | Croatia | 1.1 |
| 68 | Yemen | 1.0 |
| 69 | Syria | 0.9 |
| 70 | Bangladesh | 0.8 |
| 71 | Georgia | 0.8 |
| 72 | Nigeria | 0.7 |
| 73 | Qatar | 0.7 |
| 74 | Cuba | 0.7 |
| 75 | Bahrain | 0.6 |
| 76 | Lithuania | 0.6 |
| 77 | Sudan | 0.6 |
| 78 | Lebanon | 0.5 |
| 79 | Armenia | 0.5 |
| 80 | Belarus | 0.4 |
| 81 | Ethiopia | 0.4 |
| 82 | Cyprus | 0.4 |
| 83 | Uruguay | 0.4 |
| 84 | Slovenia | 0.4 |
| 85 | Tunisia | 0.4 |
| 86 | Madagascar | 0.3 |
| 87 | Botswana | 0.3 |
| 88 | Brunei | 0.3 |
| 89 | Kenya | 0.3 |
| 90 | Estonia | 0.3 |
| 91 | Oman | 0.2 |
| 92 | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.2 |
| 93 | Albania | 0.2 |
| 94 | Bosnia & Herzegovina | 0.2 |
| 95 | Luxembourg | 0.2 |
| 96 | Cameroon | 0.2 |
| 97 | Kazakhstan | 0.2 |
| 98 | Eritrea | 0.2 |
| 99 | Uzbekistan | 0.2 |
| 100 | Uganda | 0.2 |
| 101 | Dominican Republic | 0.2 |
| 102 | Guatemala | 0.2 |
| 103 | Elsalvador | 0.2 |
| 104 | Equatorial Guinea | 0.2 |
| 105 | Panama | 0.2 |
| 106 | Namibia | 0.1 |
| 107 | Bolivia | 0.1 |
| 108 | Zimbabwe | 0.1 |
| 109 | Afghanistan | 0.1 |
| 110 | Zambia | 0.1 |
| 111 | Guinea | 0.1 |
| 112 | Macedonia | 0.1 |
| 113 | Senegal | 0.1 |
| 114 | Cambodia | 0.1 |
| 115 | Mali | 0.1 |
| 116 | Nepal | 0.1 |
| 117 | Dem. Rep. of the Congo | 0.1 |
| 118 | Benin | 0.1 |
| 119 | Honuras | 0.1 |
| 120 | Turkmenistan | 0.1 |
| 121 | Latvia | 0.1 |
| 122 | Congo | 0.1 |
| 123 | Ghana | 0.1 |
| 124 | Costa Rica | 0.1 |
| 125 | Mozambique | 0.1 |
| 126 | Burkino Faso | 0.1 |
| 127 | Chad | 0.1 |
| 128 | Liberia | 0.1 |
| 129 | Trinidad & Tobago | 0.1 |
| 130 | Rwanda | 0.1 |
| 131 | Paraguay | 0.1 |
| 132 | Maldives | 0.1 |
| 133 | Niger | 0.0 |
| 134 | Malta | 0.0 |
| 135 | Burundi | 0.0 |
| 136 | Swaziland | 0.0 |
| 137 | Lesotho | 0.0 |
| 138 | Burma | 0.0 |
| 139 | Fiji | 0.0 |
| 140 | Tajikistan | 0.0 |
| 141 | Nicaragua | 0.0 |
| 142 | Jamaica | 0.0 |
| 143 | Togo | 0.0 |
| 144 | Djibouti | 0.0 |
| 145 | Iceland | 0.0 |
| 146 | Haiti | 0.0 |
| 147 | Mongolia | 0.0 |
| 148 | Somalia | 0.0 |
| 149 | Tanzania | 0.0 |
| 150 | Mauritania | 0.0 |
| 151 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.0 |
| 152 | Belize | 0.0 |
| 153 | Papua New Guinea | 0.0 |
| 154 | Central African Republic | 0.0 |
| 155 | Malawi | 0.0 |
| 156 | Seychelles | 0.0 |
| 157 | Sierra Leone | 0.0 |
| 158 | Comoros | 0.0 |
| 159 | Mauritius | 0.0 |
| 160 | Laos | 0.0 |
| 161 | Guinea-Bissau | 0.0 |
| 162 | Moldova | 0.0 |
| 163 | Bhutan | 0.0 |
| 164 | Suriname | 0.0 |
| 165 | Cape Verde | 0.0 |
| 166 | Guyana | 0.0 |
| 167 | East Timor | 0.0 |
| 168 | Bermuda | 0.0 |
| 169 | The Gambia | 0.0 |
| 170 | San Marino | 0.0 |
| 171 | São Tomé & Príncipe | 0.0 |
| 172 | Costa Rica | 0.0 |
| 173 | Grenada | 0.0 |
| 174 | Kiribati | 0.0 |
| 175 | Liechtenstein | 0.0 |
| 176 | Marshall Islands | 0.0 |
| 177 | Micronesia | 0.0 |
| 178 | Nauru | 0.0 |
| 179 | Palau | 0.0 |
| 180 | Saint Lucia | 0.0 |
| 181 | St. Vincent & the Grenadines | 0.0 |
| 182 | Samoa | 0.0 |
| 183 | Solomon Islands | 0.0 |
| 184 | Tuvalu | 0.0 |
| 185 | Vatican City | 0.0 |
Note: Figures are for 2010 or most recently available
Many countries go to war, but the United States of America is unique in both the size and power of its military and its propensity to use it. Since the end of WWII, the U.S. has spent more than $20 trillion to build up its military might. This is more than the cumulative monetary value of all human-made wealth in the United States.
The U.S. government has spent more on its military over the last five decades than the value of all the houses, office buildings, factories, schools, hospitals, airports, hotels, shopping centres, power plants, machinery, water and sewage systems, roads, bridges, railroads, etc., in the United States put together!
Adding up the current Pentagon budget, the nuclear weapons budget of the Energy Department, the military portion of the NASA budget, foreign military aid and other military-related expenses, the U.S. spends nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars on its military each year. If veterans' benefits and interest payments on the debt are included, the figure is closer to $1.5 trillion.
The U.S. alone is responsible for close to half of the world's military spending and spends more than 50 times as much as the combined spending of the so-called rogue states: Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria.
More than 50% of the U.S. government's annual discretionary spending – the money the President and Congress have direct control over – goes to the military. By comparison, 7% goes to education and 6% to healthcare. Cutbacks in social programs have caused far more devastation in the U.S. than any foreign army ever has.
Foreign Interventions
Every few years, the U.S. sends soldiers, warships, and warplanes to fight in distant countries. Since the end of WWII, the U.S. has:
- Atttempted to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments, most of which were democratically-elected
- Carried out over 200 military operations in which it has struck the first blow
- Grossly interfered in democratic elections in at least 30 countries
- Waged war/military action, either directly or by proxy, in some 30 countries
- Attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders
- Dropped bombs on the people of some 30 countries
- Suppressed dozens of populist/nationalist movements in every corner of the world
By its actions, U.S. foreign policy seeks not only to secure its own borders but to dominate the rest of the world. The United States has a global military presence unlike that of any other country in history. Since the end of WWII, the U.S. has killed over 20 million people in numerous wars and conflicts throughout the world.
Foreign military interventions usually serve the interests of global corporate investment, regardless of the human and ecological costs to the region. Rather than being guided by a devotion to moral principles of any kind, they serve to fulfill the following objectives:
- making the world safe for U.S. corporations, achieved by:
- the promotion of a system of relatively unregulated free enterprise that allows capital to flow freely to all parts of the world
- a system of trade that places as few barriers as possible in the way of the ability of multinational corporations to access raw materials, labour, productive facilities and markets in all parts of the world
- preventing the development of any society that might serve as a successful example of an alternative to the capitalist model
- extending political and economic control over as wide an area as possible
- preventing any challengers from emerging that might threaten U.S. military supremacy
U.S. troops sometimes remain as an occupying army after invading, enforcing U.S. dictates and putting down local protests and rebellions. The U.S. government also finances, arms, and directs local "proxy" militias to fight on its behalf to overthrow governments not compliant to "U.S. interests." The list of those declared to be an "enemy" or a "terrorist" has included many people fighting for democracy in their country – like Nelson Mandela.
Military Bases
U.S. control over most of the planet is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers all the continents, oceans, and outer space. Thousands of troops are stationed at strategic locations to be deployed into military action. With unparalleled naval and air forces, the U.S. possesses a unique capacity to act militarily anywhere in the world if it so chooses.
In addition to 4500 military bases on its own territory, the U.S. has more than 1000 bases in over 50 countries. Of these foreign bases, 760 are acknowledged by the Pentagon and at least 300 more are known to exist, many of them espionage bases. In total, the U.S. has military personnel – combatants or civilians – stationed in over 150 countries worldwide.
Following its bombing of Iraq in 1991, the U.S. acquired military bases in:
- Saudi Arabia
- Kuwait
- Bahrain
- Qatar
- Oman
- United Arab Emirates
Following its bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, the U.S. acquired military bases in:
- Kosovo
- Albania
- Bulgaria
- Macedonia
- Hungary
- Bosnia
- Croatia
Following its bombing of Afghanistan in 2001-2, the U.S. acquired military bases in:
- Afghanistan
- Pakistan
- Kazakhstan
- Uzbekistan
- Tajikistan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Georgia
- Yemen
- Djibouti
Following its bombing and occupation of Iraq in 2003, the U.S. set up over 100 military bases throughout the country of which at least 14 will remain permanently.
The U.S. Department of Defense is the world's largest landlord with over half a million buildings and structures located on nearly 5,000 sites, covering more than 185 million square metres of space worldwide. The actual number is likely much higher, as many Pentagon facilities are kept secret. The U.S. is currently in negotiations for additional sites and bases in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa.
The U.S. military is the single biggest polluter in the world, with no concern for the environmental impact of its operations. In the Status of Forces Agreements that it signs with nations around the world, the U.S. government generally insists on exemption from environmental regulations and categorically renounces any responsibility for cleaning up the pollution that its military produces or leaves behind when it pulls out. On its own soil and in U.S. territories and coastal waters, the U.S. military has been exempted from almost all EPA regulations.
September 11, 2001
For most of its history, the true costs of the wars the U.S. waged overseas had largely been hidden. U.S. taxpayers had to pay the military bills but the death and destruction was all overseas. That changed on September 11 – for the first time, the violence reached the U.S.
Few people anywhere in the world – including the Middle East – support bin Laden's terrorist methods. But they share his anger at the U.S. for supporting corrupt dictators (including Saddam Hussain during his worst crimes), supporting Israel at the expense of the Palestinians, and imposing U.S. dictates on the Middle East through violence and brutal economic sanctions.
The September 11 attacks were a response to decades of U.S. violence perpetrated against the people of the Middle East. The intended targets – the World Trade Center, the White House, and the Pentagon – were the centres of U.S. commerce, government, and military power. The message was clear: stop imposing economic, political, and military control on the people and resources of the Middle East.
"What America is tasting now is something insignificant compared to what we have tasted for scores of years. Our nation (the Islamic world) has been tasting this humiliation and degradation for more than 80 years. Its sons are killed, its blood is shed, its sanctuaries are attacked and no one hears and no one heeds. Millions of innocent children are being killed in Iraq without committing any sins....
To America, I say only a few words to it and its people. I swear to God, who has elevated the skies without pillars, neither America nor the people who live in it will dream of security before we live it here in Palestine and not before all the infidel armies leave the land of Muhammad, peace be upon him."
- Osama bin Laden, October 7, 2001
1998 interview with Osama bin Laden
Instead of reconsidering its foreign policy, the U.S. responded to the attacks with more violence. But the War on Terrorism cannot possibly end terrorism. Even though bin Laden is no longer a threat, continued U.S. aggression will encourage others to drive the U.S. out of the Middle East, inspiring more acts of terrorism.
Homeland defense has become a justification for eliminating civil rights protections long deemed inconvenient by the FBI and other police agencies. The Pentagon and the CIA now have a much freer hand in carrying out wars and violent covert operations around the world. The U.S. military has been handed practically a blank cheque to fight "terrorism" – a term that can be applied to any act of resistence to U.S. domination.
Corporate News Media
Corporate-controlled news media in the U.S. are businesses just like any other: they make a profit by selling a product to a buyer. The product is an audience and the buyer is another business. In effect, large corporations sell audiences to other large corporations. The product is you, as a viewer of media content and a consumer. To avoid alienating the buyer of their product – other corporations – the major news media generally conceal from their audience the corporate interests behind much of U.S. government policy, especially foreign policy.
Despite claims that the press has an adversarial relationship with the government, news media in the U.S. generally follow Washington's official line. The spectrum of debate falls in the relatively narrow range between the leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties. Washington policy-makers often claim that foreign interventions are necessary to protect "our interests" but the news media seldom ask what those interests are and who is actually served by them.
Across the world, a dangerous rumor has spread that could have catastrophic implications. According to legend, Iran's president has threatened to destroy Israel, or, to quote the misquote, "Israel must be wiped off the map." Contrary to popular belief, this statement was never made...
As demonstrated in Libya, Haiti, Nicaragua, and numerous other countries, defending U.S. interests usually means imposing neoliberal capitalist ecomonic policies on nations that might strike a course independent of, or unfriendly to, transnational corporate investment. This is never the reason given in major news media. Rather, it is always a matter of "stopping aggression," "protecting national security," or punishing leaders who are said to be dictators, drug dealers, or state terrorists. The "War on Terrorism" is really a global war against all those who oppose U.S. control of the planet.
The major news media expose little about the U.S. role in financing, equipping, training, and directing the repressive military forces in countries around the world. Many of the CIA's covert operations – bombings, assassinations, paramilitary massacres – are terrorism by any definition. Yet major news media will never refer to such acts "terrorism" – or describe U.S. foreign policy as "aggressive" – as long as government and military leaders proclaim they have noble intentions. The media in the U.S. will sometimes criticize their government's foreign policy as "ill-defined" or "overextended" but never as lacking in virtuous intent.
| Deaths From US and US-Supported Violence Since WWII |
||
|---|---|---|
| 1945 | South Korea | 100,000+ |
| 1945 - 1960 | China | 200,000 |
| 1947 - 1949 | Greece | 100,000 |
| 1948 - 1953 | Korea | 200,000 |
| 1953 - 1979 | Iran | 70,000 |
| 1954 | Guatemala | 120,000 |
| 1957 | Haiti | 50,000+ |
| 1960 - 1975 | Vietnam | 3,000,000 |
| 1964 | Brazil | 75,000+ |
| 1965 | Indonesia | 800,000 |
| 1965 - 1973 | Laos | 500,000+ |
| 1969 - 1973 | Cambodia | 600,000+ |
| 1971 | Bangladesh | 2,000,000 |
| 1971 - 1979 | Uganda | 200,000 |
| 1975 - 1979 | Cambodia | 2,500,000 |
| 1975 - 1999 | East Timor | 200,000+ |
| 1975 - 2002 | Angola | 1,500,000 |
| 1980 - 1990 | Iraq | 1,000,000 |
| 1980 - 1992 | El Salvador | 100,000 |
| 1981 - 1988 | Mozambique | 1,000,000 |
| 1982 - 1986 | Guatemala | 50,000+ |
| 1983 - 1987 | Lebanon | 50,000+ |
| 1984 - 2002 | Turkey | 50,000 |
| 1986 | Nicaragua | 50,000 |
| 1990 - 1991 | Iraq | 200,000 |
| 1990 - 1996 | Rwanda | 1,000,000 |
| 1991 - 1994 | Somalia | 300,000 |
| 1991 - 1999 | Iraq | 1,000,000+ |
| 1991 - 2002 | Yugoslavia | 300,000 |
| 1992 - 2002 | Liberia | 150,000 |
| 1993 - 1999 | Burundi | 200,000 |
| 1998 | Sudan | 100,000 |
| 1998 - 2002 | Congo | 3,000,000+ |
| 2003 - present | Iraq | 1,000,000+ |
Note: This list is just a small selection
| Foreign Governments Overthrown By The US Since WWII |
||
|---|---|---|
| 1947 | Thailand | Reason: To benefit economic & political interests |
| 1949 | Syria | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1949 | Greece | To benefit economic & political interests |
| 1952 | Cuba | To benefit US business interests |
| 1953 | Iran | To maintain access to cheap oil |
| 1953 | British Guyana | To ensure access to cheap sugar & bauxite |
| 1954 | Guatemala | To allow US companies to benefit from cheap labour & lax safety laws |
| 1955 | South Vietnam | To replace French-backed leader with US-backed leader |
| 1957 | Haiti | To benefit US business interests |
| 1958 | Laos | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1959 | Laos | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1960 | South Korea | To benefit US political interests |
| 1960 | Congo | To benefit political & economic interests |
| 1960 | Laos | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1960 | Ecuador | Previous government was too independent in foreign policy |
| 1963 | Dominican Republic | To benefit US business interests |
| 1963 | South Vietnam | Previous leader's policies led to televised suicides |
| 1963 | Iraq | To benefit economic interests |
| 1963 | Honduras | To gain access to resources |
| 1963 | Guatemala | The likely winner of upcoming election was not obedient to the US |
| 1963 | Ecuador | Elected government refused to support US policy on Cuba |
| 1964 | Brazil | To gain access to resources & cheap labour |
| 1964 | Bolivia | Elected government refused to support US policies against Cuba |
| 1965 | Indonesia | To benefit political & economic interests |
| 1965 | Zaire | To gain access to cobalt, copper & diamonds |
| 1966 | Ghana | Previous government was too independent in foreign policy |
| 1967 | Greece | To install US military bases |
| 1968 | Iraq | To benefit economic interests |
| 1970 | Cambodia | The king refused to allow his country to join the US attack on Vietnam |
| 1970 | Bolivia | To maintain access to cheap oil & tin |
| 1972 | El Salvador | To maintain access to cheap coffee and other products |
| 1973 | Chile | To benefit US business interests, especially access to cheap copper |
| 1974 | Portugal | To benefit political interests |
| 1975 | Australia | Elected government had independent foreign policy |
| 1979 | South Korea | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1980 | Jamaica | To benefit US business interests |
| 1980 | Liberia | To benefit US political interests |
| 1982 | Chad | To install a government obedient to US demands |
| 1983 | Grenada | To make the island a haven for offshore banks |
| 1987 | Fiji | To allow US ships to use the country's ports |
| 1989 | Panama | To maintain US control of the Panama Canal |
| 1992 | Afghanistan | To benefit political and economic interests |
| 2001 | Afghanistan | To benefit US geo-political and economic interests |
| 2003 | Iraq | To serve US geo-political interests and ensure control of the country's oil |
| 2004 | Haiti | To benefit economic interests |
| Dictators Supported By The US |
||
|---|---|---|
| 1876 - 1880 1884 - 1911 |
Porfirio Díaz | Mexico |
| 1898 - 1920 | Manuel Estrada Cabrera | Guatemala |
| 1925 - 1933 | Gerardo Machado | Cuba |
| 1926 - 1945 1949 - 1955 |
Bao Dai | Vietnam |
| 1928 - 1968 | António de Oliveira Salazar | Portugal |
| 1928 - 1949 1949 - 1975 |
Chaing Kai-Shek | China & Taiwan |
| 1930 - 1945 | Getúlio Vargas | Brazil |
| 1930 - 1961 | Rafael Trujillo | Dominican Republic |
| 1930 - 1974 | Haile Selassie | Ethiopa |
| 1931 - 1944 | Jorge Ubico | Guatemala |
| 1931 -1944 | Maximiliano Hernández Martínez | El Salvador |
| 1932 - 1948 | Tiburcio Carías Andino | Honduras |
| 1933 - 1944 1952 - 1959 |
Fulgencio Batista | Cuba |
| 1937 - 1947 1950 - 1956 |
Anastasio Somoza García | Nicaragua |
| 1939 - 1975 | Francisco Franco | Spain |
| 1941 - 1979 | Mohammad Reza Pahlavi | Iran |
| 1944 - 1945 | Osmín Aguirre y Salinas | El Salvador |
| 1944 - 1971 | William Tubman | Liberia |
| 1948 - 1952 | Carlos Prío Socarrás | Cuba |
| 1948 - 1957 | Plaek Pibulsonggram | Thailand |
| 1948 - 1960 | Syngman Rhee | South Korea |
| 1950 - 1958 | Marcos Pérez Jiménez | Venezuela |
| 1952 - 1999 | Hussein bin Talal | Jordan |
| 1954 - 1957 | Carlos Castillo Armas | Guatemala |
| 1954 - 1989 | Alfredo Stroessner | Paraguay |
| 1955 - 1963 | Ngo Dinh Diem | South Vietnam |
| 1957 - 1971 | François "Papa Doc" Duvalier | Haiti |
| 1957 - 1958 1963 - 1973 |
Thanom Kittikachorn | Thailand |
| 1958 - 1963 | Miguel Ydígoras Fuentes | Guatemala |
| 1958 - 1969 | Muhammad Ayub Khan | Pakistan |
| 1959 - 1990 | Lee Kuan Yew | Singapore |
| 1960 - 1993 | Félix Houphouët-Boigny | Ivory Coast |
| 1961 - 1962 | Julio Adalberto Rivera Carballo | El Salvador |
| 1961 - 1999 | Hassan II | Morocco |
| 1962 - 1979 | Park Chung-hee | 1962 - 1979 |
| 1963 - 1966 | Enrique Peralta Azurdia | Guatemala |
| 1963 - 1975 | Oswaldo López Arellano | Honduras |
| 1964 - 1965 | Nguyen Khanh | South Vietnam |
| 1964 - 1967 | Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco | Brazil |
| 1964 - 1969 | René Barrientos | Bolivia |
| 1965 - 1967 | Nguyên Cao Kỳ | South Vietnam |
| 1965 - 1979 | Ian Smith | Rhodesia |
| 1965 - 1986 | Ferdinand Marcos | Philippines |
| 1965 - 1997 | Mobutu Sese Seko | Zaire |
| 1965 - 2006 | Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah | Kuwait |
| 1966 - 1994 | Hastings Kamuzu Banda | Malawi |
| 1966 - 1998 | Mohammed Suharto | Indonesia |
| 1967 - 1973 | Georgios Papadopoulos | Greece |
| 1967 - 1975 | Nguyên Văn Thiêu | South Vietnam |
| 1967 - 1972 1974 - 1979 |
Anastasio "Tachito" Somoza Debayle | Nicaragua |
| 1967 - 2005 | Gnassingbé Eyadéma | Togo |
| 1967 - present | Hassanal Bolkiah | Brunei |
| 1969 - 1971 | Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan | Pakistan |
| 1969 - 1975 | Tran Thien Khiem | South Vietnam |
| 1969 - 1981 | Omar Torrijos | Panam |
| 1969 - 1991 | Mohamed Siad Barre | Somalia |
| 1970 - 1974 | Carlos Manuel Arana Osorio | Guatemala |
| 1970 - 1975 | Lon Nol | Cambodia |
| 1970 - 1970 | Anwar Sadat | Egypt |
| 1971 - 1978 | Hugo Banzer | Bolivia |
| 1971 - 1979 | Idi Amin | Uganda |
| 1971 - 1986 | Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier | Haiti |
| 1972 - 1977 | Arturo Armando Molina | El Salvador |
| 1972 - 1988 | Chiang Ching-kuo | Taiwan |
| 1973 - 1990 | Augusto Pinochet | Chile |
| 1975 - 1979 | Pol Pot | Cambodia |
| 1976 - 1981 | Jorge Rafael Videla | Argentina |
| 1977 - 1988 | Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq | Pakistan |
| 1978 - 1982 | Fernando Romeo Lucas García | Guatemala |
| 1978 - 1989 | P.W. Botha | South Africa |
| 1978 - 1992 | Deng Xiaoping | China |
| 1978 - 2002 | Daniel arap Moi | Kenya |
| 1979 - 1982 | Adolfo Arnaldo Majano Ramo | El Salvador |
| 1979 - 2003 | Saddam Hussein | Iraq |
| 1979 - present | Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980 - 1988 | Chun Doo-hwan | South Korea |
| 1980 - 1990 | Samuel Doe | Liberia |
| 1981 - 2011 | Hosni Mubarak | Egypt |
| 1982 - 1983 | Efraín Ríos Montt | Guatemala |
| 1982 - 1986 | Roberto Suazo Córdova | Honduras |
| 1982 - 1989 | Manuel Noriega | Panama |
| 1982 - 2005 | Fahd bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud | Saudi Arabia |
| 1983 - 1993 | Turgut Özal | Turkey |
| 1985 - 1993 | Ibrahim Babangida | Nigeria |
| 1986 - 1991 | Vinicio Cerezo | Guatemala |
| 1987 - 1999 | Sitiveni Rabuka | Fiji |
| 1987 - 2011 | Zine El Abidine Ben Ali | Tunisia |
| 1989 - 2004 | Alfredo Cristiani | El Salvador |
| 1990 - 2000 | Alberto Fujimori | Peru |
| 1990 - 2005 | Askar Akayev | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1990 - 2006 | Saparmurat Niyazov | Turkmenistan |
| 1990 - present | Nursultan Nazarbayev | Kazakhstan |
| 1990 - present | Islam Karimov | Uzbekistan |
| 1991 - 1994 | Raoul Cédras | Haiti |
| 1992 - present | Emomalii Rahmon | Tajikistan |
| 1993 - 1998 | Sani Abacha | Nigeria |
| 1997 - 2001 | Laurent-Désiré Kabila | Dem. Rep. of the Congo |
| 1999 - 2008 | Pervez Musharraf | Pakistan |